What happened in Tull v us?

In Tull v. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied Tull’s demand and, after a bench trial, concluded that Tull had illegally filled wetland areas and imposed civil penalties. …

What Amendment was Tull vs United States?

In Tull v. United States5 the Court held that under the Seventh Amendment defendants are entitled to a jury trial when the government seeks civil penalties under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act6 (FWPCA or Clean Water Act).

What Court case involved the 7th Amendment?

In Curtis v. Loether , the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Seventh Amendment gives parties the right to a jury trial in all civil cases, even when the basis for the lawsuit is a congressionally enacted statute rather than a “common law” cause of action.

Who won Feltner vs Columbia?

Columbia won partial summary judgment as to liability on its copyright infringement claims and then exercised the option afforded by § 504(c) of the Copyright Act (Act) to recover statutory damages in lieu of actual damages.

What is the Seventh Amendment right?

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

How did the Griswold v Connecticut case use the 9th Amendment?

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Court held that the right of privacy within marriage predated the Constitution. The ruling asserted that the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments also protect a right to privacy.

How is the Seventh Amendment violated?

In that opinion, the court states the contention to be that to make the decision of the motion for new trial depend upon a remission of part of the verdict is in effect a re-examination by the court in a mode not known at the common law of facts tried by the jury, and therefore a violation of the Seventh Amendment.

What happened in Feltner v Columbia?

Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that if there is to be an award of statutory damages in a copyright infringement case, then the opposing party has the right to demand a jury trial.

Which does the Ninth Amendment limit?

The Ninth Amendment limits the ability of the national government to infringe non-enumerated rights.